Skip to main content
  • Home
  • Contact Us
TA Center logo
Bookmark and Share
  • About Us
    • About the TA Center
    • TA Center Staff
    • About the Grantees
    • Cross-Site Evaluation Team
    • Technical Partners
  • Contacts for Grantees
    • Grantee Locator Map View
    • Grantee Locator List View
  • Meetings & Webinars
    • Past Meetings & Webinars
    • Events by Other Organizations
  • National Center Publications
    • EBP Fact Sheets
    • Grantee Vignettes
    • Monographs
    • Prevention Briefs
    • Promote Prevent Guides
    • Toolkits
  • Resources
    • Title Search
  • SS/HS
  • Project LAUNCH

Implementing, Supporting, and Monitoring the Evaluation

Once the evaluation plan has been created and approved, you need to determine whether the project has the capacity to carry out the plan or whether additional capacity must be created. For example, you may need to purchase analytical software, secure storage for data forms, and train the people who will collect the necessary data.

In most cases, the evaluator is primarily responsible for supporting the implementation of the evaluation in the field. The evaluator can train or coach interviewers, provide survey or interview materials, and solve problems that arise while collecting data, such as assisting the schools in scheduling surveys.

Although monitoring the evaluation is the responsibility of the evaluator, you, as the project director, need to stay fully informed about the progress of the evaluation, since you are responsible for ensuring that all aspects of the initiative work together smoothly. For example, a delay in administering pretests could produce a situation in which there is not enough time to teach an evidence-based program before the end of the academic year, which could affect its fidelity.

For more information, please see the Working with an Evaluator Section of the SS/HS Evaluation Toolkit.

Questions to Guide Your Thinking

  • Do you have the personnel with the skills and time to carry out the evaluation?
  • Do you know what will be required to maintain this capacity through the life of the SS/HS Initiative (e.g., additional materials or additional trained personnel in case of staff turnover) and do you have plans for maintaining capacity?
  • Do all partners and participants understand the importance of carrying out evaluation tasks when they are scheduled and according to the training they received?
  • Do they have a copy of the evaluation timeline and understand which tasks are related to their work?
  • Is the evaluator monitoring the process evaluation for delays that might make anticipating and solving implementation problems more difficult?
‹ Evaluation Plan up Reporting and Using Evaluation Results ›

Table of Contents

  • Introduction to SS/HS Evaluation
  • Working with an Evaluator
  • Evaluation Design
  • Performance Indicators
  • Measures and Instruments
  • GPRA
  • PPRA and FERPA
  • Protection of Human Subjects
  • The National Evaluation
  • Logic Model
  • Evaluation Plan
  • Implementing, Supporting, and Monitoring the Evaluation
  • Reporting and Using Evaluation Results
  • About Us
  • Contacts for Grantees
  • Meetings & Webinars
  • Publications
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration
A project of Education Development Center, Inc.
American Institutes for Research
Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development
National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention | Project LAUNCH | Safe Schools Healthy Students
©2010, Education Development Center, Inc. All Rights Reserved.